Companies are responding to climate issues, but the standards and tools for them to fully address environmental, social and governance () corporate sustainability challenges remain in development, industry leaders from around the world said at the in London last week.
Much focus was given to a new , due to take effect on 1 January 2024, that will require larger firms to publish regular reports on the social and environmental impacts of their activities. Yet current reporting standards are fragmented and often vary between nations and companies.
Corporate sustainability reporting standards diverge
We have been in 鈥渁 period of extreme divergence鈥� in terms of standards, said Sue Armstrong-Brown, global director of environmental standards and thought leadership at environmental disclosure non-profit CDP. Although a global baseline is in sight, the divergence remains too great, she added.
New International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) standards provide a solid foundation for standardised reporting alongside existing Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards. Reporting is through the (formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project), if the company is one of the around 50% globally that do so.
Companies have to decide how they report and figure out whether the standard they have chosen is compliant with applicable regulations in their jurisdiction. Regulators have to decode different standards. The challenge is compounded by the fact that a lot of current reporting is based on estimates, particularly around , which are emissions produced by suppliers to and users of products that a company produces.
CSRD will only affect multinationals and large national firms at the start; the conference repeatedly heard that small and medium enterprises (SMEs) often lack the incentives and capacity to produce quality ESG reports.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalDataBig picture climate change
Reporting is only one piece of the puzzle. The aim of corporate sustainability reporting standards is to allow businesses to quantify efforts they are making to decarbonise their production and supply chains, ideally incentivising other companies to do so. There was plenty of talk at the Reuters IMPACT conference about the need to measure and quantify these moves but also conversations about the existential threat climate change poses.
Economist Ann Pettifor and UN Global Compact Network UK executive director Steve Kenzie discussed whether capitalism can survive these shocks, and another panel questioned the fitness of current corporate leaders to tackle the climate crisis.
Many companies have committed to net zero, but numerous sessions on how to convince executives to buy into decarbonisation and move suppliers towards more sustainable production suggest there is still demand for these skills.
The role of politics
Heather Buchanan of Bankers for Net Zero, an organisation that 鈥渙perates at the touchpoint between the real and the financial economy鈥�, emphasised that politicians . This is compounded by an 鈥渁nti-woke鈥� backlash, fuelling far-right regimes across the world.
Ingmar Juergens, co-founder and CEO of Climate & Company, a sustainable finance think tank, explained the entanglement of the two causes: 鈥淲ith this really weird , anti-climate, anti-woke story they want to go to the elections. That’s not conservative politics. That’s nonsense. But that鈥檚 what we鈥檙e up against.鈥�
As approaches, GRI CEO Eelco van der Enden鈥檚 wishes at Reuters IMPACT seem apt not only for world leaders but all players in the global economy: 鈥淚 would stick to the words of the late and great American philosopher, Elvis Presley: .鈥�
